Chief Executive Officer Gender and Sustainability Disclosure: Evidence from Listed Firms in Kenya

Main Article Content

Benjamin K. Tarus https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4896-5541
Emmanuel Tanui https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5214-7395
Carolyne Ayuma

Keywords

CEO gender, gender diversity, sustainability disclosure, institutional theory, Nairobi Securities Exchange

Abstract

Sustainability disclosure - the public reporting of a firm’s economic, environmental and social impacts has hardened from a voluntary gesture into a commercial and regulatory imperative, yet in emerging markets its depth and quality remain uneven, and the drivers of substantive rather than symbolic reporting are poorly understood. Because disclosure in weakly enforced settings rests on executive judgement, upper echelons theory directs attention to the characteristics of the executives who exercise it and few characteristics have attracted more governance attention, or produced less settled evidence, than gender. Existing findings are concentrated in developed markets and at board level, leaving the chief executive position itself, where strategic discretion is greatest, largely unexamined in frontier-market settings. This study therefore examines sustainability disclosure among firms listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE) a market in which women held roughly one in ten chief executive positions over the study period and where regulatory pressure for both diversity and disclosure has intensified - testing the effect of CEO gender diversity, operationalised as the proportion of women in the apex executive leadership of the firm, anchored on the chief executive position. Using a balanced panel of 320 firm-year observations drawn from 32 NSE-listed firms over the period 2014-2023, sustainability disclosure is measured through content analysis of annual and sustainability reports against a 38-item economic, environmental and social index scored on a 0-3 quality scale. Hausman-selected fixed-effects regression, estimated in Stata, shows that CEO gender diversity exerts a positive and statistically significant effect on sustainability disclosure (β = 0.064, p = 0.023), robust to the inclusion of firm size, firm age and profitability and to a battery of panel diagnostics. The finding is consistent with gender-socialisation, stakeholder-orientation and institutional accounts in which female representation at the corporate apex strengthens ethical sensitivity, stakeholder responsiveness and receptiveness to isomorphic reporting pressures, and it positions executive gender diversity as a substantive governance resource - not a symbolic gesture - for nomination committees and regulators in emerging markets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 20 | PDF Downloads 12

References

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007

Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1063-y

Bananuka, J., Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Kaawaase, T. K., Mindra, R. K., & Kayongo, I. N. (2022). Sustainability performance disclosures: The impact of gender diversity and intellectual capital on GRI standards compliance in Uganda. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 12(5), 840-881. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-09-2021-0301

Barako, D. G., Hancock, P., & Izan, H. Y. (2006). Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(2), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00491.x

Ben-Amar, W., Chang, M., & McIlkenny, P. (2017). Board gender diversity and corporate response to sustainability initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(2), 369-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1

Bhatia, A., & Tuli, S. (2017). Corporate attributes affecting sustainability reporting: An Indian perspective. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(3), 322-340. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-11-2015-0057

Business Daily. (2024). Only 32pc of CEOs, MDs in Kenya are women - survey. Business Daily Africa.https://www.businessdailyafrica.com/bd/corporate/companies/only-32pc-of-ceos-mds-in-kenya-are-women-survey-4965444

Business Today. (n.d.). The 11 most powerful women in corporate Kenya. Business Today Kenya. Retrieved July 22, 2026, from https://businesstoday.co.ke/these-11-women-exercise-power-at-nse-listed-companies/

Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y

Capital Markets Authority. (2015). Code of corporate governance practices for issuers of securities to the public, 2015. Government of Kenya, Gazette Notice No. 1420. https://www.ecgi.global/publications/codes/code-of-corporate-governance-practices-for-issuers-of-securities-to-the-public

Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003

Cicchiello, A. F., Fellegara, A. M., Kazemikhasragh, A., & Monferrà, S. (2021). Gender diversity on corporate boards: How Asian and African women contribute on sustainability reporting activity. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 36(7), 801-820. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-05-2020-0147

Cucari, N., Esposito De Falco, S., & Orlando, B. (2018). Diversity of board of directors and environmental social governance: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1452

Deegan, C. (2019). Legitimacy theory: Despite its enduring popularity and contribution, time is right for a necessary makeover. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2307-2329. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3638

Dienes, D., Sassen, R., & Fischer, J. (2016). What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(2), 154-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2014-0050

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 283-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283

Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., Elamer, A. A., & Zhang, Q. (2019). A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 206-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2250

Faccio, M., Marchica, M.-T., & Mura, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.008

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. (Reissued 2010 by Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675

Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4), 481-517. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.47.4.g6167429416hg5l0

Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI universal standards. GRI. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334-343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628

Higgins, C., Tang, S., & Stubbs, W. (2020). On managing hypocrisy: The transparency of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Research, 114, 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.041

Hsiao, C. (2022). Analysis of panel data (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009057745

Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965-990. https://doi.org/10.1086/226425

Kipngetich, S., & Gatauwa, J. (2024). Environmental, social and governance disclosure practices among firms listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(1), 44-62.

Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.005

Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002

Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate
Finance, 28, 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016

Macchioni, R., Prisco, M., & Zagaria, C. (2024). Board gender diversity and environmental material topics: Evidence from GRI-based reports in the Italian context. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 26(1), 28-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-08-2023-0255

Machado, B. A. A., Dias, L. C. P., & Fonseca, A. (2021). Transparency of materiality analysis in GRI-based sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 570-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2066

Madill, A., & Gough, B. (2008). Qualitative research and its place in psychological science. Psychological Methods, 13(3), 254-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013220

Magara, R., & Maune, A. (2026). Sectoral variation in sustainability disclosure among Kenyan listed firms. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 16(1), 1-24

Mahran, K., & Elamer, A. A. (2024). Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and corporate environmental sustainability: A systematic literature review and avenues for future research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 1977-2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3577

McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. (2017). The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 75-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.001

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105

Nairobi Securities Exchange. (2021). ESG disclosures guidance manual. NSE. https://www.nse.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/NSE-ESG-Disclosures-Guidance-Manual.pdf

Nazari, J. A., Hrazdil, K., & Mahmoudian, F. (2017). Assessing social and environmental performance through narrative complexity in CSR reports. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 13(2), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2017.05.002

Opoku, R. N. (2022). Effect of sustainability accounting disclosures on financial performance of listed banks in Ghana [Master’s thesis, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology]. KNUST Institutional Repository. https://ir.knust.edu.gh

Orazalin, N., & Mahmood, M. (2019). Determinants of GRI-based sustainability reporting: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10(1), 140-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-12-2018-0137

Sheikh Abu Bakar, A. B., Ghazali, N. A. B. M., & Ahmad, M. B. (2019). Sustainability reporting in Malaysia: The extent and quality. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 816-835. https://hrmars.com/papers_submitted/6009/Sustainability_Reporting_in_Malaysia_The_Extent_and_Quality.pdf

Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z

Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005